I very much appreciate you doing this - I was permanently banned from Twitter / X a couple of years ago - for what reason I am not sure - and as a consequence I have missed many of your threads.
Please consider doing the same for all of your great work. And all the best.
Ah thanks for letting me know it's actually helpful to post the content on here as well. I will keep that in mind, and try to do semi-regular compilation posts of various topics I've discussed in greater detail on twitter and put them here as well. It's also easier to read, twitter isn't for long-format stuff.
Upon reading this superb essay I noted somethings to comment about.
I'd posted on X numerous times about Harris's cover-up/shielding of pedophilic Catholic priests in San Francisco when she was DA. From Lee Fang's 2019 Intercept article it was quite clear that she did this because the Catholic Church in SF is politically powerful and this was the politically expedient thing to do. I wondered over and over again why this obvious flaw was ignored by everybody, including her political enemies on the right. Your explanation makes sense, and I had never thought about it, and that is that the right did not want to bring up anything so unfavorable towards the Catholic Church.
Besides the comment above I have another observation to share and that is that in the videos AOC is way more relaxed, genuine and authentic in her voice, facial expressions and body language than she is in her rather new-found remake of herself in the image of Nancy Pelosi. If she continues in her high-pitched and forced language and mannerisms of lies and deceit--e.g., Harris is tirelessly working for a cease-fire--she will certainly lose the bid for presidency that she's seeking for her future. It's offensive, though of course I can't speak for everyone.
Thank you for your thoughts and looking forward to reading your work again. I just wish it wasn't about genocide.
Yes, it really is amazing. There is an actual Pizzagate-like scenario here with Kamala, where she actively covered up for pedophilic mass rape and even allowed them to happen by refusing to prosecute them as even the AP wrote about alongside The Intercept, and it has been completely memory-holed. Conservatives have never brought it up. The only reason is because they also don't want to offend the Catholic Church. So it's yet another example, as with Israel, of both sides of the ruling class being beholden to powerful lobbies and institutions.
And you're also right about AOC. It's not just a political shift, but the shift accompanied her entire demeanor and physical being also shifting. Btw the same happened with Corbyn after he was elected Labour leader, and all the freaks surrounding him like Owen Jones and Paul Mason demanded he throw aside his relaxed, spontaneous and to put it in a single word: populist demeanor, in favor of being a PR-managed suit-wearing hyper-sensitive always on edge walking on eggshells politician, because that's what "the people really want", and by "the people" they meant the liberal media and political class.
And of course as soon as Corbyn bowed to that, he lost the one element that could have ensured not only his personal but also his movement's political survival.
I have not finished my ready of this topic could not wait to response you that when they did not know how to arrange China whether following America or stand for China, I gave them the answer by telling them thousand times that Taiwan was a part of China, pls give this credit to Mr Xijinping when jams doubted many times to tell me how China could interfere Palestine cuz it was violate the law cuz Taiwan was the same thing.
When I told David moral is always over institutions, he gave jams pseudo-logic by saying that western countries were good was cuz they have made good rules and laws, but I said laws could limit regular ppl but morality could let the richest one to be good, that’s cuz he does not want to jams take responsibility for his wrong doing to us while he could also do not need take it as well, so jams would not blame him while protecting him.
I saw Elon musk’s job when at that time you desperately blamed him many times online, but he was just also one of the chess. Every time I saw his talking I felt so sorry about his language skills, his mouth was so Stubbom, but I liked ppl being real and honest than playing more vanity to attract to others to gain more credits and supports. Let’s us talk about the presidents of United States, they never get someone who were truly moral and could adhere to who they are not what they have. I felt sad about Elon must lost his position to get a so called job by trying to play so hard in public than those who sleep with others just trying to become one of them to achieve his goal, but he never agree with me about put moral and purity as priority cuz he never could achieve that level at all by kept staying at my home. I had the same fate with musk to be honest I had done nothing and also my husband and my daughter and xijinping all cuz of David.
I very much appreciate you doing this - I was permanently banned from Twitter / X a couple of years ago - for what reason I am not sure - and as a consequence I have missed many of your threads.
Please consider doing the same for all of your great work. And all the best.
Ah thanks for letting me know it's actually helpful to post the content on here as well. I will keep that in mind, and try to do semi-regular compilation posts of various topics I've discussed in greater detail on twitter and put them here as well. It's also easier to read, twitter isn't for long-format stuff.
Also, please come join us in Blsky. 🙏🏼 I miss your threads 🧵 since getting booted out of X.
Upon reading this superb essay I noted somethings to comment about.
I'd posted on X numerous times about Harris's cover-up/shielding of pedophilic Catholic priests in San Francisco when she was DA. From Lee Fang's 2019 Intercept article it was quite clear that she did this because the Catholic Church in SF is politically powerful and this was the politically expedient thing to do. I wondered over and over again why this obvious flaw was ignored by everybody, including her political enemies on the right. Your explanation makes sense, and I had never thought about it, and that is that the right did not want to bring up anything so unfavorable towards the Catholic Church.
Besides the comment above I have another observation to share and that is that in the videos AOC is way more relaxed, genuine and authentic in her voice, facial expressions and body language than she is in her rather new-found remake of herself in the image of Nancy Pelosi. If she continues in her high-pitched and forced language and mannerisms of lies and deceit--e.g., Harris is tirelessly working for a cease-fire--she will certainly lose the bid for presidency that she's seeking for her future. It's offensive, though of course I can't speak for everyone.
Thank you for your thoughts and looking forward to reading your work again. I just wish it wasn't about genocide.
Yes, it really is amazing. There is an actual Pizzagate-like scenario here with Kamala, where she actively covered up for pedophilic mass rape and even allowed them to happen by refusing to prosecute them as even the AP wrote about alongside The Intercept, and it has been completely memory-holed. Conservatives have never brought it up. The only reason is because they also don't want to offend the Catholic Church. So it's yet another example, as with Israel, of both sides of the ruling class being beholden to powerful lobbies and institutions.
And you're also right about AOC. It's not just a political shift, but the shift accompanied her entire demeanor and physical being also shifting. Btw the same happened with Corbyn after he was elected Labour leader, and all the freaks surrounding him like Owen Jones and Paul Mason demanded he throw aside his relaxed, spontaneous and to put it in a single word: populist demeanor, in favor of being a PR-managed suit-wearing hyper-sensitive always on edge walking on eggshells politician, because that's what "the people really want", and by "the people" they meant the liberal media and political class.
And of course as soon as Corbyn bowed to that, he lost the one element that could have ensured not only his personal but also his movement's political survival.
I have not finished my ready of this topic could not wait to response you that when they did not know how to arrange China whether following America or stand for China, I gave them the answer by telling them thousand times that Taiwan was a part of China, pls give this credit to Mr Xijinping when jams doubted many times to tell me how China could interfere Palestine cuz it was violate the law cuz Taiwan was the same thing.
When I told David moral is always over institutions, he gave jams pseudo-logic by saying that western countries were good was cuz they have made good rules and laws, but I said laws could limit regular ppl but morality could let the richest one to be good, that’s cuz he does not want to jams take responsibility for his wrong doing to us while he could also do not need take it as well, so jams would not blame him while protecting him.
I saw Elon musk’s job when at that time you desperately blamed him many times online, but he was just also one of the chess. Every time I saw his talking I felt so sorry about his language skills, his mouth was so Stubbom, but I liked ppl being real and honest than playing more vanity to attract to others to gain more credits and supports. Let’s us talk about the presidents of United States, they never get someone who were truly moral and could adhere to who they are not what they have. I felt sad about Elon must lost his position to get a so called job by trying to play so hard in public than those who sleep with others just trying to become one of them to achieve his goal, but he never agree with me about put moral and purity as priority cuz he never could achieve that level at all by kept staying at my home. I had the same fate with musk to be honest I had done nothing and also my husband and my daughter and xijinping all cuz of David.
I call it was depraved sucking dick.
This is not obviously pseudo-logic but I read so many pseudo-logics so many many that David persuade to Jams but truly made me disgusting.